In an obvious effort to appease Trump, economic adviser Kevin Hassett refused to admit to CNN's Dana Bash that Trump urging people to take hydroxychloroquine may get them killed.
May 24, 2020

After Trump blurted out at a press conference last week that he's supposedly been taking hydroxychloroquine preventatively for two weeks, despite FDA warnings, a recent Lancet study found there were no benefits to treating patients with the hydroxychloroquine, and patients were more likely to die in hospital and develop heart rhythm complications than those who were not treated with the anti-malarial drug drug.

CNN's Dana Bash asked Trump economic adviser Kevin Hassett about the dangerous medical advice being given by his boss on this Sunday's State of the Union, and in an obvious effort to appease Trump, Hassett refused to acknowledge that what he's been doing could very well get people killed.

BASH: I want to ask about hydroxychloroquine. The new study this week says that the drug was associated with an increased risk of in-hospital death. President Trump, as you know, has been publicly touting the drug and says he's been taking to it. I want you to listen to what he said.
TRUMP: I've taken it. I think just about two weeks. I think it's another day. So -- and I'm still here. I'm not a doctor. But I have common sense. If some other person put it forward and said, oh, let's go with it, you know, what do you have to lose? If things don't go as planned, it's not going to kill anybody.

BASH: “It's not going to kill anybody.” Well, we now know according to this study, a major study, that is not true. The president has been giving medical advice on hydroxychloroquine. Do you think that that is putting American lives at risk?

HASSETT: The problem right now is that we're going up against this enemy, the virus, that we don't know how to treat yet and we're watching treatments go through the pipeline at hospitals all around the world and aggregating data to try to learn about it.

As Dr. Fauci said at press conferences, what we really need is a controlled randomized trial so that we can figure this out. I think until we see a large scale controlled randomized trial, there will be questions. Ans, so unfortunately we're in a world, where doctors all around the world are anecdotally trying things and watching to see what works and doesn't work and they're treating their patients accordingly.

And, I wish we were in a better world where we had all these treatments that have had the gold standard trials and everybody --

BASH: Have you taken it? You're in the White House, and --

HASSETT: You know it's --

BASH: -- would you take it or are you?

HASSETT: We're really not supposed to talk about our personal health here. The thing I can say though is, the only reason I do actually talk about my health in this case is that I talked about it with my doctor because I think there is a lot of evidence in the lab that this could help.

And then he said oh, looking at the other stuff you're taking, the interaction, it gives me a concern, so I don't think you should take it. And so the point is, just like the doctor, people who are out there who are wondering about it, they need to talk to their doctors about it and make sure it doesn't interact with other things they're taking.

And that's why I gave... otherwise I would have just said, why are you asking about my personal health? I thought I should use it as an opportunity to remind people that everybody needs to go talk to their doctor about it if they think they want to take it.

BASH: Well, that is very good advice.

No Dana, that's called weasel words. "Good advice" would be following Neil Cavuto's lead on this one.

Discussion

We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Any comments that are sexist or in any other way deemed hateful by our staff will be deleted and constitute grounds for a ban from posting on the site. Please refer to our Terms of Service for information on our posting policy.
Mastodon